Expert Criminal & Forensic Reports for Court and Legal Proceedings
Sentencing decisions in serious or complex cases are rarely straightforward. Judges and advocates may need to understand why an offence occurred, what the realistic risks are for the future, and whether treatment, rehabilitation, or specific conditions could meaningfully reduce those risks.
Pre-sentencing psychological reports provide this structured understanding. They offer an independent, evidence-based formulation of the defendant’s mental health, personality, risk, and rehabilitation needs, to assist the court in passing a fair and proportionate sentence.
Dr Aisha Ali prepares clear, balanced reports for criminal courts, Crown Prosecution Service and defence teams, often working alongside related assessments such as fitness to plead and stand trial and risk of reoffending and dangerousness. For an overview of the full medico-legal service, see the main criminal and forensic reports hub.
This service is aimed at:
Criminal defence solicitors and barristers preparing for sentence
CPS lawyers seeking an independent view of risk, culpability, or rehabilitation
Judges requiring expert input before passing sentence in complex cases
Probation and offender management teams working alongside psychological evidence
Parole or review hearings where updated psychological information is needed before decisions are made
Typical scenarios include:
Serious violence, sexual offences, arson, or homicide where long sentences are being considered
Complex presentations involving personality disorder, neurodivergence, or long-standing trauma
Repeated offending with uncertainty about treatability or risk management in the community
Cases where a custodial sentence is likely but the court wants to understand treatment options and conditions that may reduce risk
A pre-sentencing psychological report is a structured, clinical assessment that addresses questions such as:
What psychological and social factors contributed to the offending?
How do mental health, personality, trauma, or cognitive difficulties affect culpability and risk?
What is the realistic risk of reoffending or serious harm in different settings?
What interventions or supports would meaningfully reduce that risk?
It is distinct from:
A fitness to plead report, which focuses on ability to participate in trial (see fitness to plead and stand trial assessments)
A probation pre-sentence report, which usually has a broader social focus and is not a specialist psychological opinion
Narrow, offence-specific risk reports (for example, standalone violence and aggression assessments or sexual offence and grooming assessments)
Instead, a pre-sentencing psychological report integrates mental health, risk, and rehabilitation needs into a coherent formulation directly tailored to the sentencing exercise.
A specialist pre-sentencing assessment can be particularly useful when:
There is serious interpersonal violence, repeated assaults, or use of weapons – often alongside a dedicated violence and aggression assessment
The index offence involves sexual offending, online grooming, or exploitation – sometimes combined with a sexual offence and grooming assessment
There are concerns about dangerousness, escalation, or risk of grave harm – linking closely with risk of reoffending and dangerousness evaluations
The defendant has a diagnosed or suspected personality disorder, longstanding relationship difficulties, or complex trauma – see also personality disorders in offenders and trauma and victims of crime assessments
There is a pattern of fire-setting, arson, or fascination with fire – where an arson and fire-setting evaluation may be appropriate
The case involves organised offending such as money laundering and drug trafficking or terrorism and extremism (see terrorism and extremism case assessments)
Pre-sentencing reports are also commonly requested in murder and manslaughter cases, where understanding intent, emotional state, and risk is essential; these may sit alongside focused murder and manslaughter assessments.
Although each report is tailored to the specific case and instructions, core domains usually include:
The assessment explores:
Childhood, family dynamics, and early attachments
Education, work history, and social functioning
Previous offending and contact with services
The defendant’s own account of the index offence, including beliefs, emotions, and triggers
The aim is not to re-litigate guilt, but to understand how past experiences and current psychological functioning relate to the behaviour for which the person has been convicted.
Where relevant, the pre-sentencing work may draw upon more detailed offence-specific assessments – for example, violence and aggression, sexual offence and grooming, or arson and fire-setting.
A detailed clinical interview is then conducted with the defendant, adapted to their level of ability and communication style.
This typically includes:
Personal, developmental, educational, and occupational history
Psychiatric history and current mental health symptoms
Substance use and any history of head injury or neurological illness
Previous contact with mental health or learning disability services
A mental state examination is completed to assess:
Appearance, behaviour, and engagement
Mood and affect
Thought processes and content (including delusions, preoccupations, and suicidal ideation)
Perceptions (for example hallucinations)
Insight and judgment
The aim is to understand how current mental health and cognitive functioning may influence understanding, decision-making, and participation in court.
The report assesses:
Current and past mental health difficulties (for example depression, psychosis, anxiety, PTSD)
Personality traits and patterns that may maintain offending – such as impulsivity, hostility, or emotional dysregulation
Trauma history, victimisation, and how it interacts with offending behaviour – see related trauma and victims of crime work
Neurodevelopmental conditions such as autism or ADHD, and any learning disability or cognitive impairment
Where personality disorder or complex trauma are central, the report may cross-refer to a dedicated personality disorders in offenders assessment.
Pre-sentencing opinions typically include a structured analysis of risk, often in combination with a fuller risk of reoffending and dangerousness evaluation. This can cover:
Risk of general reoffending
Risk of serious violence, sexual harm, or arson
Likely scenarios for risk (for example substance misuse, intimate relationships, certain peer groups)
Self-harm and suicide risk, particularly at the point of sentence or in custody – linking to dedicated self-harm and suicide risk assessments where indicated
The report also identifies:
Existing protective factors – such as prosocial relationships, occupational skills, or prior periods of stability
Motivation to change, insight into offending, and engagement with treatment
Responsivity factors – for instance, literacy, language, learning style, or cultural considerations that affect suitability for programmes
This helps the court understand not only risk, but also what is realistically needed to reduce it.
The process begins with a clear letter of instruction setting out:
The conviction(s) and relevant sentencing range
Specific questions – for example about risk, mental disorder, or suitability for treatment pathways
Any existing reports (psychiatric, probation, psychological) and court directions
Key documents are requested and reviewed, including:
Prosecution summaries and sentencing notes
Witness statements and custody records
Previous expert reports and treatment records
Prison or secure hospital notes
Where there are unresolved questions about fitness to plead, the court may commission a separate fitness to plead and stand trial assessment before sentence.
A detailed interview is conducted with the defendant, typically covering:
Personal history and life events
Mental health symptoms over time
Substance use and patterns of intoxication or withdrawal
Offence-related thinking, attitudes, and beliefs
A mental state examination is completed to assess current mood, thought processes, perceptions, and reality testing, with attention to any ongoing psychosis, severe mood disturbance, or cognitive impairment that may impact risk or rehabilitation.
Where appropriate, standardised tools may be used to assess:
Personality structure, traits, and interpersonal style
Trauma symptoms, dissociation, or post-traumatic stress
Cognitive abilities and neuropsychological functioning
Structured risk factors and protective factors for reoffending and serious harm
For higher-risk or complex cases, this often dovetails with a dedicated risk of reoffending and dangerousness report.
Findings are drawn together into a clear psychological formulation – a narrative explaining how the person’s history, mental health, personality, and context have contributed to the offending and how risk can be reduced.
The opinion section is explicitly structured around the court’s questions, addressing:
Psychological factors relevant to culpability and insight
Nature and level of risk in custody and in the community
Realistic treatment options, programmes, or settings that match the person’s needs and responsivity
Any psychological considerations relevant to length and conditions of sentence (without attempting to replace the judge’s role or advise on exact tariffs)
The report may help the court understand:
Whether mental disorder, neurodevelopmental difficulties, or trauma meaningfully reduced the defendant’s emotional or cognitive capacity at the time of the offence
Whether patterns such as callousness, sadism, or entrenched antisocial attitudes are present and how they affect risk
The degree of insight, remorse, and motivation to change
These factors can be relevant when weighing mitigation, dangerousness, or the need for extended or indeterminate sentences.
The report can assist with decisions such as:
Whether a treatment-oriented or rehabilitative component is necessary or realistic
What type of psychological therapy, offence-focused work, or specialist programme is most suitable
Whether particular conditions (for example substance misuse treatment, mental health follow-up, or restrictions on contact or internet use) are likely to reduce risk
Whether a hospital-based disposal or specialist unit should be considered, alongside psychiatric opinion
Where required, further detail can be provided in linked reports such as violence and aggression assessments, sexual offence and grooming assessments, or terrorism and extremism case assessments.
For long sentences or cases likely to come before the Parole Board, pre-sentencing reports can lay the groundwork for:
Future risk reviews and risk of reoffending and dangerousness reassessments
Structured plans for treatment within custody and step-down to the community
Clear benchmarks for progress, such as completion of specified programmes or changes in dynamic risk factors
Dr Ali frequently prepares pre-sentencing reports for serious and complex offences, including:
Homicide, murder, and manslaughter, often alongside murder and manslaughter psychological assessments
Serious violence in domestic, community, or gang contexts – linked with violence and aggression assessments
Sexual offending, exploitation, and online harms – integrated with sexual offence and grooming assessments
Arson and fire-setting, particularly where fire has symbolic or emotional meaning – see arson and fire-setting evaluations
Organised crime, money laundering, and drug trafficking – explored further in money laundering and drug trafficking case assessments
Terrorism and extremism, in conjunction with terrorism and extremism case assessments
Many individuals in these categories have also been victims of significant trauma. Where appropriate, this is addressed through complementary trauma and victims of crime assessments, ensuring that both offending and victimisation are properly understood.
The typical steps are:
Initial enquiry – by phone or email, summarising the offence, key concerns, and sentencing timetable.
Formal instruction – a written instruction and case papers are sent securely, with clear questions for the expert.
Assessment appointment – arranged in prison, secure hospital, community clinic, or by secure video where appropriate.
Assessment – clinical interview, mental state examination, and any necessary testing are completed.
Draft report (optional) – may be shared with the instructing party to check factual accuracy.
Final report – a signed report is provided in good time before the sentencing hearing.
Urgent work can sometimes be accommodated, particularly where sentencing has been adjourned for a report.
Assessments can be undertaken in:
Prisons and young offender institutions
Medium and high-secure hospitals
Community or court-adjacent clinics
By secure video, where clinically and practically suitable
Dr Ali works closely with prison and hospital staff to ensure safe, private, and clinically appropriate conditions for assessment.
What information should we provide with our instruction?
As a minimum: the indictment, prosecution summaries, any sentencing notes, previous expert or probation reports, and recent prison or medical records. Clear written questions help ensure the report directly addresses the court’s needs.
Do you recommend specific sentences or tariff lengths?
The report does not advise on exact sentence length, which is the judge’s role. Instead, it explains psychological factors relevant to culpability, risk, and rehabilitation, and outlines realistic treatment or management options the court may wish to consider.
Can pre-sentencing reports be combined with other assessments?
Yes. It is often efficient to combine pre-sentencing work with risk of reoffending and dangerousness, violence and aggression, self-harm and suicide risk, or sexual offence and grooming assessments where this is proportionate.
Do you act for defence, prosecution, or the court?
Dr Ali accepts instructions from defence, prosecution, and directly from the court. In all cases, the duty is to the court, and opinions are independent and evidence-based.
What if there are disagreements between experts?
Differences of opinion do occur. In such situations, clear reasoning and transparent use of evidence allow the court to weigh competing views. Joint statements or experts’ meetings can be arranged where required.
Can you assess someone who is acutely unwell or lacks capacity to instruct?
Where there are serious concerns about capacity to participate in proceedings, a separate fitness to plead and stand trial assessment may be needed first. If someone is too unwell to engage at all, the court may need updated medical or psychiatric evidence before a pre-sentencing assessment can safely proceed.
Dr Aisha Ali accepts instructions from solicitors, local authorities, guardians, and courts across the UK. Assessments can be arranged within agreed timescales, with urgent cases accommodated where possible.
Referrals are handled securely and confidentially in line with data protection and court protocol.
Contact:
For instructions or enquiries, please use the secure contact form or email provided on this site.
Phone: 0044 7508 161794
Email: info@draishaali.co.uk
Address: Dr Aisha Ali
F04 1st Floor Knightrider House,
Knightrider Street, Maidstone, United Kingdom,
ME15 6LU
Pre-sentencing opinions often sit alongside other specialist reports within the wider criminal and forensic reports cluster, including:
Together, these pages create a coherent expert evidence network, allowing the court to receive focused, clinically robust answers to the full range of criminal and forensic questions that arise at sentencing and beyond.